Given the physical evidence that supported the Scottsboro defendants innocence, and taking into account the prejudices that local juries brought to the case, do you think a Southern lawyer should have been hired sooner, and could have been more successful that controversial New York trial lawyer Samuel Leibowitz in the second trial?

Given the physical evidence that supported the Scottsboro defendants innocence, and taking into account the prejudices that local juries brought to the case, do you think a Southern lawyer should have been hired sooner, and could have been more successful that controversial New York trial lawyer Samuel Leibowitz in the second trial? Exaplain your answer
 Click Here To Get More on This Topic......