Read pages 167-174
"The earthquake in Haiti" and then answer the following
questions. If you annotate the different versions it will assist with
your interpretation.
1. As you read
these various accounts, which aspects of them had the greatest emotional
inpact? Was it, as Jonah Lehrer wrote, the stories of individual
trdegy? Or was it the more general descriptions of the wide scale human
catastrphe? What accounts for the difference in your reactions?
In her masterpiece "
Making Sense of Haiti" Amy Davidson poses the question How do we get our
minds around a disaster on such an incomprehensble scale? is it
individual photgraphs and personal stories of rescue and death? Is it
descriptions and statics that detailthe scope of the catastrophe? Is it
video footage showing collapsed buildings, corpses stacked on the roads, and
the people desperate for food and medical attention? Is it photographs from the
air that presents a panorama of destruction? Or is it a roll of graph
paper with the seismic readings of the eartquake? Or is it all of the
above? What do you think. Pay careful attention to vocabulary and
word usage.
In George Packer's
article Suffering" he explores the way people try to find some sense or
meaning in a natural disaster like this, some way to help them cope with the
human loss and suffering. What explanation explanation would you
give for this earthquake and the suffering that follows? Why does Packer
believe that thw word ha a moral obligation to help Haiti rebuild itself?
4. In the article
"Aftershock," the authors' perspective is forward looking. Why
do they believe the earthquake caused so much physical and human
destruction? What steps must be taken to rebuild a Haiti that is safer,
healthier, and more economically sound than the previous one?
No comments:
Post a Comment