In your initial research, is the JJS pointed in the right direction and should certain
cases be bumped to superior court, where these cases can be used to set an
example to other juveniles? Is this an effective deterrent, where the social media
often sensationalizes the cases, where they become political hot potatoes and
the D.A.s have to move forward and bump them, otherwise they will not get re-elected
and look weak? I have a hard time with exceptions to the rule, where the whole point
of having the age limit effectively defined is to ensure that we focus on rehabilitation
and not create a scenario where the system is subjective to the whim, will, or fancy
of an individual, what are your thoughts?
Click Here To Get More on This Topic......
No comments:
Post a Comment