The
Case Assignment
Most
of us are familiar with the role of a manager and a leader. We also know the
functions each is expected to perform. However, there is a trend in the UK that
puts managers in a different role. This trend is manager as coach (MAC) and
will be the focus of this assignment. Before beginning the tasks, please
read the following article:
Ladyshewsky,
R. K. (2010). The manager as coach as a driver of organizational development. Leadership
& Organization Development Journal, 31(4), 292-306.
- What is meant by
the terms manager as coach (MAC)?
- Is this role
more appropriate for a leader or manager?
- What are the
advantages of it? What are the disadvantages?
- How does it fit
with the other roles of a manager and leader?
- Would this be an
effective tool in a healthcare setting? Why or why not?
Expectations
Assignment
Expectations:
1.
Be sure to conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to
familiarize yourself with the facts of the case and be sure to justify/support
your position.
2.
Limit your responses to a maximum of three pages.
3.
Please support your discussions with scholarly support (3-5 references). Be
sure to properly cite all references.
4.
Apply critical thinking skills the the assignment component.
5.
I will grade your paper on your ability to address the assignment criteria
listed above with depth and breadth of discussion. I will also critique your
writing format (i.e. proper reference citations, spacing, etc.).
Your
case paper will be further evaluated based on the following criteria:
Precision (Excellent;
Good; Average; Poor)
- Each question
and or assignment requirement is addressed in the paper
- Accuracy of your
answers, key points and supporting discussion
Clarity (Excellent;
Good; Average; Poor)
- The paper is well
organized, concise, reads clearly, and it is not confusing.
Breadth (Excellent;
Good; Average; Poor)
- The paper
presents appropriate breadth covering the assignment
questions/requirements
Depth (Excellent;
Good; Average; Poor)
- Presents key
points that lead to deeper matters and issues
- Integrates
several points into coherent conclusions
Critical
Thinking (Excellent;
Good; Average; Poor)
- The paper
demonstrates good understanding and synthesis of the module background
material
- Logically
incorporates key concepts presented in the background material into the
overall analyses, key points and supporting discussions
- Presents
well-reasoned conclusions and position as well as convincing arguments in
support of the same
Writing
Mechanics
- Grammar
(Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
- Spelling
(Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
- Vocabulary
(Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
- Referencing
(Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Additional
considerations to keep in mind while working on your case assignments:
Originality
and Use of directly quoted material
- The purpose of
each assignment is for you to present your understanding and synthesis of
the background material and key concepts. Accordingly, this must be
accomplished substantially in your own words.
- Use directly
quoted material sparingly and only when preserving the exact words of an
author is necessary. For purposes of this course, rarely should directly
quoted material represent more than 5-10 percent of your entire case
paper’s content. Composing a paper patched together from mostly quoted
material is not acceptable.
- Be sure to
properly reference all directly quoted material and include the in-text
citations. All paraphrased information also requires reference citations
at the end of the paraphrased section.
Grades
- A paper that
answers all assignments questions and supports the same with good key
points, well supported discussions and quality references will earn a
solid “B” grade.
- Please remember
that “A” papers are exceptional works that go beyond just answering the
questions and provide insightful answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment