The market
The predicted and out-turn index of GNP increased
over the past five years. The industry is trading semi-durable products and it
is at its growth stage. From the figure below, actual GNP increased by about
1-3% per year and there is strong sign of increasing GNP for the following
years. The total potential of the markets is estimated to be 30 million units
and the trend of sales volume is also expected to increase drastically. The
sales units increased from 120000 units to 4937500 units from year 1 to 5 and
each of the active and background company account for 5% of market share, with
40% in total. Furthermore, the replacement rate is 75% per annum and it is a
significant source of potential sales. Therefore, we can tell that the market
is far from saturation and the growth potential is huge. The sales units for
all companies by year 9 are still far from the true potential of the market,
which are 30 million units. The market is fast growing enough that none of the
companies can achieve significant market share.
Our company sells identical products to those of
our competitors and there is no single company has control over market price. Product
differentiation comes in the form of how prestigious of the product is and the
location of product. This market structure is called monopolistic competition. Since
demand curve is downward sloping, advertising is crucial. It can create a less
elastic demand curve, thus extracting an additional price for the products.
|
year 1
|
year 2
|
year 3
|
year 4
|
year 5
|
Industry wide sales revenue
|
15,000,000
|
41,000,000
|
100,000,000
|
207,000,000
|
395,000,000
|
highest price
|
150
|
105
|
90
|
85
|
85
|
lowest price
|
100
|
80
|
80
|
75
|
75
|
average price
|
125
|
93
|
85
|
80
|
80
|
no of estimated units sold
|
120,000
|
443,243
|
1,176,471
|
2,587,500
|
4,937,500
|
The market is far from saturation and there is no
dominant player. The number of estimated units sold is increasing and the
industry wide sales revenues increased with increased marketing expenditure. They
are all positive signals of growing market and positive economy. However, the
optimistic growth forecast was limited by increased price competition in
maturity stage and possible aggressive takeover by other firms.
SWOT analysis:
Strengths:
l
Low debt/equity ratio
|
Weakness:
l
Low ROE
l
Low ROCE
l
Low profitability after
takeover
l
Low asset turnover
|
Opportunities
l
Growing market
l
Positive economic
outlook
l
No dominant player
l
Tax incentives
|
Threats:
l
Increased price
competition in maturity stage
l
Competitive mergers
|
Product Life Cycle
The lifespan of products go through 4 stages: 1)
Introduction 2) Growth 3) Maturity 4) Decline. The industry is expected to
achieve a 65% penetration of the market by year 9 and higher penetration will
not be likely to achieve in the following years. Hence, we expect the products
would enter its decline stage eventually after year 9. Different marketing and
pricing strategies should be implemented in different stages, for instance, a
relative large amount of money should be spent on marketing to maintain sales
growth because demand is inelastic during growth stage.
Sales and marketing strategies
We did not maintain stable net profit over the 7
periods. We failed to understand marketing expenses and selling prices are key
drivers for growth until period 7.
Based on product life cycle, year 1-5 is
introduction stage; year 6-8 (period 1-3) is growth period, year 9-12(period
4-6) is maturity period. We expect we would enter decline period afterwards.
Our marketing expenses during growth period were too low to increase product
awareness; whereas our price was too high at period 4 when the market became
mature. In period 7, we adopted a better strategy by lowering our sales price
during mature stage.
Revised strategies:
Price elasticity tends to decrease over the product
life cycle. Skim pricing strategies would be adopted when launching the
products by charging a higher price then gradually lowering the price. A more
inelastic demand curve would give greater revenue from a skimming price as
quantity sold would not be so different between two prices (marketing). During
the introduction stage, when demand is inelastic, we would set price higher
than average to establish demand. The growth stage is a period of rapid revenue
growth. Sales increases as more customers get familiar with the products.
Therefore, increasing marketing expenses is more effective than reducing sales
prices. Sales continue to increase at a slower pace at maturity stage.
Competition may result in decreased market share. Since replacement sales
become more dominant in maturity period, price reduction strategy is more
effective in this stage.
Distribution strategies:
We originally planned to develop area 4 since it is
less developed, in turn less competitive. However, we then focused on both 4
areas in order to avoid unnecessary loss. Compared with our major competitors,
companies 181 and 185, put most resources on 1 or 3 areas rather than all 4
areas. Shipping cost can be saved with such strategy. Our shipping costs
accounted for 4%-10% of total sales revenues, which is quite high. We chose
area 4 to build our factory because it is relatively less competitive (only one
team developed it) and we have started developing it since period 1.
Revised Strategies:
We would first focus on home sales (area 2) and 3
areas during growth stage to reduce shipping cost. Afterwards, when production
increases in maturity stages, economics of scale can be achieved when shipping
100,000 units or more. We would then focus on 3 areas or all 4 areas after
period 5. We believe building factory in area 4 is a right decision given it
has generated the highest revenue in period 7 when we also adopt the right
price reduction strategies.
Dealers:
Our number of dealers matches exactly with
production and sales. We did not sell in excess of dealer capacity of 2500 and
they are also fully utilized, except period 4, in which we mistakenly set very
high price and result in poor sales. Overall, we believe the dealers’ strategy
is a right one.
Dealer’s utilization:
Period 1
|
Period 2
|
Period 3
|
Period 4
|
||||||||||||||||
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
||||
2230
|
2500
|
2500
|
1130
|
2157
|
2140
|
2240
|
2285
|
2200
|
2192
|
2083
|
2091
|
1488
|
1123
|
1253
|
2142
|
||||
Period 5
|
Period 6
|
Period 7
|
|||||||||||||||||
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
A1
|
A2
|
A3
|
A4
|
||||||||
2500
|
2491
|
2500
|
2500
|
2177
|
2460
|
2250
|
2493
|
2345
|
2500
|
2500
|
2464
|
||||||||
Production and marketing strategies
Our production increased by 0%-25% each period,
based on our estimate increase in demand. We had relatively high closing stocks
in each period, except period 2, 3 and 7. It indicated that our production and
marketing strategies are not optimized. Period 2 and 3 was growth period and we
did not have enough stocks to meet with demand. We reduced our selling price in
period 7 which resulted in relatively high sales revenue.
Revised Strategies:
With the incorporation of market strategy in
production planning can increase our profit. We would build the factory in
earlier period to meet with increased demand in growth period. We would also increase
our production and marketing expenses at peak periods, whereas reducing our
sales price and increase our production to meet with the increased demand at
maturity stage.
Future Strategies: (conclusion section?)
Since we have built two factories in area 2 and 4, in
order to maximize our profit, we will mainly focus on these two areas in latter
periods. We would also start eliminating not so profitable channels of
distribution during decline stage. We would put the proportional increase in
dealers to cope with sales increase in these two areas. As we are already in
mature stage, our main goal is to sustain the market share and extend the
product life cycle. Therefore, we will reduce our price similar to the market
average in response to competition while avoiding a price war. In the decline
stage, when sales begin to decrease and demand is highly elastic, we will
consider minimizing prices, lower than average, in order to increase demand or
maintain sales. Marketing expenses would be minimized because customers have
already been familiar with the products and future sales are mainly driven by
replacement demand.
No comments:
Post a Comment